Cardiac
Troponins as Markers of Myocardial Injury
Cardiac enzymes have emerged as
major diagnostic criteria for detection of myocardial injury.
However, the common cardiac markers (CK, CK-MB, aspartate
aminotransferase, and lactate dehydrogenase) have limitations for
detection of myocardial damage: short diagnostic window, limited
sensitivity, and lack of specificity because of the expression of
cardiac enzymes in skeletal muscle. On the basis of these
limitations and the unique amino acid sequence of myofibrillar
cardiac proteins, monoclonal antibodies were developed for detection
of cardiac troponins (T and I) through immunoassays.
The troponin complex consists
of 3 protein subunits: troponin I, troponin T, and troponin C. These
proteins are located in myofibrils of cardiac and skeletal muscle
tissue, are expressed by different genes, and have a key role in
regulating calcium-mediated muscle contraction through interaction
of actin monomers with myosin heavy chains.[29]
Troponin T (37 kd), which is
responsible for binding the troponin complex to tropomyosin, is
expressed in 3 different isoforms: slow- and fast-twitch skeletal
muscle troponin T and cardiac troponin T. The cardiac subunit of
troponin T is encoded by a separate gene that gives it a unique
amino acid sequence. Troponin I (21 kd) prevents contraction in the
absence of calcium through inhibition of adenosine triphosphatase
activity of the actin-myosin interaction and is encoded by 3
different genes and expressed as various muscle tissue isoforms:
slow- and fast-twitch skeletal and cardiac troponin I.[30]
Finally, troponin C (18 kd) is responsible for regulating the
process of thin-filament activation during skeletal and cardiac
muscle contraction.[31] In this process calcium ions bind
to troponin C, which inhibits the activity of troponin I.
As a result of the unique
amino acid sequence, high intracellular concentration, and
continuous release from damaged myocardium,[32]
immunoassays for detection of myofibrillar cardiac proteins are the
most sensitive and specific serum markers of myocardial injury.
Cardiac
Troponins in Ischemic Coronary Syndromes
Cardiac troponin T and cardiac
troponin I are highly sensitive specific markers of myocardial
injury in ischemic coronary syndromes.[33-35] Also, the
increase of these markers has been associated with poor short- and
long-term outcomes (Table I) in patients with unstable angina and
acute myocardial infarction (AMI).[36-39,44-46]
Troponin
T
Cardiac troponin T is present in
the myocyte in high concentrations, both in a cytosolic and
structurally-bound protein pool. The cytosolic pool amounts to 6%,
whereas the amount in myofibrils corresponds to 94% of the total
troponin T mass in the cardiomyocyte.[47] The release of
troponin T secondary to ischemic myocardial damage could be
explained by 2 mechanisms. During reversible ischemia there is a
loss of integrity of the membrane that results in transient leakage
of troponin from the cytosolic compartment.[48] When
ischemic injury becomes irreversible, the intracellular acidosis and
activation of proteolytic enzymes leads to disintegration of the
contractile apparatus, with continuous release of troponin T from
the bound protein pool.[49,50]
In AMI, 50% of patients have
cardiac troponin T in circulation within 3 hours after the onset of
pain. There is an increase in the cardiac troponin T serum
concentration of 30- to 40-fold above the upper detection limit
between 10 and 24 hours after AMI, with a plateau from the second to
the fifth day. The serum levels remain increased until day 12 or
more. In patients receiving thrombolytic therapy, the comparison of
early and late increases in cardiac troponin T concentration after
AMI may provide important information regarding infarct size and
reperfusion.[34] The cutoff value of cardiac troponin T
for detection of AMI is 0.1 ng/mL. The sensitivity for diagnosis of
AMI remains near 100% within 4 to 10 hours until the sixth day, with
a specificity of 74%.[31,34] In addition, the cardiac
troponin T assay allows the monitoring of myocardial cell necrosis
in patients with nonacute coronary syndrome conditions, such as
those with perioperative cardiac damage, transplant rejection, or
inflammatory cardiac diseases.[31,34,51]
Despite the high sensitivity
of the cardiac troponin T assay for detection of myocardial
necrosis, a false-positive result can occur in renal failure,
rhabdomyolysis, polymyositis, and muscular dystrophy.[52-56]
A new assay for cardiac-specific troponin T (thrombin enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay) was developed to avoid the false-positive
results of the first-generation assays. In this enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay the cross-reacting antibody 1B10 has been
replaced by a high-affinity, cardiac-specific antibody (M11.7). The
detection limit of this new assay is lower than that of the first
generation: 0.0123 µg/L versus 0.04 µg/L, respectively.[57]
Troponin I
The same clinical applications
of cardiac troponin T are also valid for cardiac troponin I.[34]
However, cardiac troponin I is very specific for the heart because
of the sequence of its 31 amino acids on the N-terminus and the
dissimilarity of this sequence from the skeletal troponins.[58]
In addition, Adams et al[35] observed that cardiac
troponin I was not found in the sera of patients who had acute or
chronic skeletal muscle damage unless concurrent heart muscle injury
was also present. Moreover, cardiac troponin I is not expressed in
regenerating human skeletal muscle.[58] Cardiac troponin
I, which has a sensitivity of 96.6% and specificity of 94.9% for
detection of AMI, becomes detectable in the serum within 4 hours
after infarction, peaks at 14 to 18 hours, and remains increased for
5 to 7 days.[34]
Cardiac Troponins in CHF
The association of cardiomyocyte
death and the presence of serum myofibrillar cardiac proteins in
end-stage heart failure has attracted increasing interest (Table I).
The first clue for this association was reported by Missov et al[40]
in 1995. A cardiac troponin I assay (cutoff value = 0.1 ng/mL) was
tested in 11 male patients with end-stage CHF and 11 control
subjects. Troponin I was positive in 2 of 11 patients with CHF and
normal in all control subjects. The authors concluded that some
patients with end-stage CHF could have high levels of cardiac
troponin I that would reflect chronic myocardial cell destruction.
In a further study the same
group reported preliminary results for the evidence of elevated
serum cardiac troponin I in human end-stage heart failure.[41]
A much more sensitive immunoenzymometric assay for detection of
cardiac troponin I assessed the sera of 11 male patients with
end-stage heart failure and 11 healthy control subjects. This new
assay had a cutoff value of 10 pg/mL and a detection limit of 3 pg/mL.
These values were far below the cardiac troponin I assay used in the
previous report. All but one patient with CHF had high circulating
levels of cardiac troponin I, whereas the control subjects had serum
levels of this marker below the detection limit. In addition, the
authors observed a meaningful correlation of high cardiac troponin I
levels with lower LVEF (r = -0.70, P = .01).
The final report provided the
first evidence for ongoing myofibrillar degradation of
cardiomyocytes and increased cardiac troponin I levels in patients
with advanced heart failure.[59] Cardiac troponin I was
assessed in the sera of 35 patients with severe CHF (New York Heart
Association functional class III and IV), 55 healthy blood donors,
and 25 hospitalized control subjects without known cardiac disease.
The newer, more sensitive assay (lower detection limit of 3 pg/mL)
was used in this population. The study[59] also assessed
standard cardiac assays: troponin I (upper reference limit of 0.1 ng/mL),
CK-MB isoenzyme, and myoglobin. The more sensitive troponin I assay
showed a mean mass concentration significantly higher in patients
with CHF (P < .01) than in healthy blood donors or hospitalized
control subjects. With the standard assay, 1 patient had a positive
result (0.206 ng/mL), 26 patients had results below the upper
reference limit, and 8 patients had negative results. However, mean
concentrations of troponin I were identical in patients undergoing
heart failure and in the control group (0.02 ± 0.01 vs 0.01
± 0.002 ng/mL). CK-MB mass and myoglobin levels were within
the normal reference ranges for all groups; however, patients with
CHF showed an absolute increase in CK-MB and myoglobin that
paralleled the increase of the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I
assay. The authors concluded that the presence of cardiac troponin I
in the sera of patients with advanced heart failure was a
consequence of the cellular injury and degradative processes of the
contractile apparatus involved in the progression of this disease.
They also noted that the detection of cardiac troponin I depended on
the sensitivity and specificity of the assay used.
The association between
cardiac troponin I levels and the severity of heart failure was
reported by La Vecchia et al.[42] Serum samples from 26
inpatients and outpatients with nonischemic CHF and 25 normal
control subjects were prospectively evaluated for the presence of
cardiac troponin I. The study rationale was the experimental
observation that clinical deteriorations or episodes of
decompensation from acute heart failure are associated with
myocardial cell damage. The assay used had a lower limit of
detection of 0.3 ng/mL. All patients had cardiac troponin I
reassayed during hospitalization to relate the changes in the serum
levels to their clinical course. Detectable cardiac troponin I was
observed in 6 (23%) patients, 5 of whom were admitted because of
recent or severe episodes of CHF decompensation. The comparison of
clinical characteristics between patients with detectable and
undetectable cardiac troponin I levels in sera showed that the
former group had recent episodes of deterioration (P < .0001),
worse functional NYHA class (P = .003), a higher heart-failure score
(P = .0009), and worse LV function (P < .0001). Three of six
patients with detectable cardiac troponin I died. In addition, the
normalization of cardiac troponin I levels in circulation during
hospitalization was associated with an improvement of CHF. However,
these findings must be confirmed in studies with larger sample
sizes.
The prognostic value of a
second-generation assay for detection of cardiac troponin T in CHF
was reported by Setsuta et al.[43] The study included 50
patients with ischemic and nonischemic CHF (NYHA functional class
II-IV). The endpoint measured was a composite of readmission or
death because of worsening CHF (cardiac event). The authors found
that the event rate in patients with cardiac troponin T levels of
0.05 ng/mL or greater was significantly higher than in patients with
cardiac troponin T levels of less than 0.05 ng/mL (1 year, 82.6% vs
27.3%, P = .0003). The discriminator value reported for
identification of patients undergoing heart failure with a high risk
for cardiac events (cardiac troponin T level of 0.05 ng/mL or
greater) was lower than the discriminator value used for diagnosis
of patients with AMI (cardiac troponin T level of 0.1 ng/mL or
greater).
Ricchiuti et al[30]
studied the distributions of cardiac troponins I and T in an
experimental model of left ventricular remodeled myocardium. The
authors compared the changes in tissue cardiac troponin I and
cardiac troponin T by quantifying the relative protein levels in
normal and diseased cardiac tissue in a postinfarction porcine heart
failure model. Heart samples were collected from similarly sized
healthy (control group) and left ventricular remodeled Yorkshire
pigs. Postinfarction remodeling was obtained from occlusion of the
left circumflex coronary artery and subsequent left ventricular
remodeling over a period of 2 months. A significant decrease in
protein mass and concentration for cardiac troponins I and T in left
ventricular remodeled hearts was observed. The authors hypothesized
that the decrease in tissue cardiac troponins could be due to
decreased synthesis of cardiac troponin I and cardiac troponin T
through downregulation of their respective mRNA, chronic loss of
cardiac troponins associated with LV dysfunction, decreased coronary
flow reserves, and bioenergetic abnormalities. However, this study
did not quantitate cardiac troponin T and cardiac troponin I in
blood from left ventricular remodeled pigs to correlate their serum
levels with the loss of these proteins observed in remodeled
myocardium.
The preliminary observation
of serum cardiac troponins in patients undergoing heart failure may
be related to ongoing myocardial damage involved in the progression
of this syndrome (Figure 1). However, the mechanisms by which
troponins are released into circulation in CHF is unknown. The
presence of recurrent episodes of ischemia in patients with CAD and
CHF could be an important factor because CAD is the main etiology of
CHF.[26] However, other processes may be involved because
cardiac troponins have been detected in patients with nonischemic
heart failure. Experimental models of heart failure showed the
importance of the coronary microcirculation and the impairment of
subendocardial perfusion as possible mechanisms of myocyte necrosis
with release of cardiac troponins and progression to heart failure.
The release of cardiac troponins in CHF may result from apoptotic
cell death in ventricular remodeling. Although there is no
experimental evidence to support this assumption, it is possible
that the large diagnostic window, high sensitivity, and high
specificity of troponin assays may allow detection of cardiomyocyte
apoptosis. Therefore experimental studies are necessary and feasible
to allow testing this hypothesis.
 |
(click image to zoom) Figure
1. Mechanisms of cardiomyocyte death in the progression
to end-stage heart failure.
|
The release of cardiac troponins
in advanced heart failure correlates with multiple processes that
eventually destroy the contractile apparatus. Further studies will
be necessary to elucidate the actual mechanism and determine the
clinical significance of cardiac troponins in CHF.
Cardiac Troponins in Congestive
Heart Failure from American
Heart Journal
Am Heart J 138(4):646-653, 1999. © 1999 Mosby-Year Book, Inc
Reprint requests:
Christopher M. O'Connor, MD, FACP, FACC, Box 3356, Duke University
Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
|